Created date

January 15, 2013

Content type (localized)



Entering the Next Phase of Digitalization: Observations from India


India is a vast market today for pay- TV, with more than 100 million pay-TV households and an estimated 140 million TV households. It is also arguably among the least developed markets for pay-TV, despite these numbers. For example, the number of TV households pales in comparison to the country’s population of 1.2 billion+. Also, India still does not have a digital terrestrial transmission plan, true high definition (HD) programming is limited, average monthly subscription fees are among the lowest in the world, and cell phones outnumber television sets by more than 5:1.

As with most countries around the world, cable is the dominant form of pay- TV in India. Frost & Sullivan estimates that there are 6,000 multi-system operators (MSOs) and 60,000 local cable operators (LCOs) serving Indian subscribers today. In contrast, the country only has seven direct to home (DTH) satellite TV operators and four IPTV service providers, although these are posing a growing challenge to cable. Partly to control piracy, but also in large measure to more effectively tap into the vast potential of this market, the Indian cable industry is undergoing a comprehensive and very rapid metamorphosis as the entire country switches to digital cable.

The investments required for digitalization are considerable – cost estimates range from USD $2 to 4 billion. Recouping these investments is not a straightforward proposition in India. Consumers have limited awareness of the value of digital cable, and remain significantly more sensitive to cost than to content selection and quality. The role of local cable operators (LCOs), that own the actual relationships with end cable subscribers, also makes it difficult for MSOs to independently differentiate services and grow revenues in a way that provides satisfactory levels of return on investment in digitalization, and promises long-term growth potential.

Value-added services like Internet telephony, triple data services (voice, Internet and TV), advanced media services such as video-on-demand (VoD), multi-screen content services and HD, and new applications such as gaming are attractive targets for monetization for two reasons:

1)    They can raise the all-important average revenue per user (ARPU) without the need to increase base subscription fees.

2)    They can promote subscriber loyalty, increase TV watching times in subscriber households, and ultimately serve as a magnet for increased advertisement revenue.

However, these services cannot be implemented over the traditional cable architecture that predominantly relies on uni-directional QAM connections to end subscribers. A multi-network architecture that encompasses uni-directional or (better) bi-directional DVB networks, along with IPTV and/or broadband for OTT services is necessary to deliver the full range and quality of possible content and applications to the widest possible range of subscribers.

It is easy to see that optimally meeting the needs of this tremendously diverse audience using only the bouquet-based linear live model will be neither optimal nor effective in the long term. On-demand, OTT and IP-based delivery can play significant roles in growing long-term monetization capability for Indian MSOs by allowing a much broader range of services and applications to be delivered in a customized and cost-effective fashion to a wide range of households.

Still, many risks and questions remain.

Are Indian subscribers ready to consider such offerings and will they understand the value proposition?

Is it realistic to lay out these more complex network architectures when many MSOs are grappling with the newness of even basic digitalization?

What business models will succeed, and how should offerings be positioned and priced?

How should MSOs evaluate and select partners, technologies and vendors, and what cost structure and ROI levels can they expect?

These are all open issues and unsolved questions for the majority of tier II and tier III MSOs in India, with even tier I operators still grappling with many of the same challenges. Predictably, many myths and misconceptions abound in the cable community as well regarding value added services and the role of multi-network solutions in monetization of digital cable.

We’re taking this discussion to the floor at Convergence India this week, during 2013’s first Multi-Network Solutions in the Real World Forum. I’m excited to be moderating this discussion, which features panelists from Ericsson, Magnaquest Technologies, iNovo Broadband and Verimatrix.

We’ll continue to post insights and discussions from the Forum and also on my blog here. Whether you are an MSO, an LCO or a technology vendor – if you have a story to share or a question to ask, please feel free to reach out to us via email, join our the Frost & Sullivan group on LinkedIn, or follow the discussion on Twitter (#multinetwork #CI2013).